As of 2026-03-30, 火兔工具箱's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 数字创意产品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 27.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 火兔工具箱's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
火兔工具箱's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
火兔工具箱's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
火兔工具箱's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
火兔工具箱's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
火兔工具箱's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCanva | 34.69% | 4.08% | 7.14% | 32.65% | 10.2% | View Details |
| AAdobe | 32.65% | 24.49% | 35.71% | 32.65% | 14.29% | View Details |
| FFigma | 22.45% | 0% | 0% | 16.33% | 4.08% | View Details |
| FFlowpix | 18.37% | 8.16% | 7.14% | 16.33% | 0% | View Details |
| uuplog | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 红红薯智语 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 火火兔工具箱 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
