As of 2026-04-02, Icelandic Glacial's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 基础饮用水 category shows: The overall mention rate is 2.04%, below the industry average by 13.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (2.04%) has exceeded positive (2.04%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Icelandic Glacial's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Icelandic Glacial's Mention Rate is 2.04%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Icelandic Glacial's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Icelandic Glacial's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Icelandic Glacial's Positive Rate is 2.04%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Icelandic Glacial's Negative Rate is 2.04%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 农农夫山泉 | 79.59% | 59.18% | 38.89% | 75.51% | 24.49% | View Details |
| 怡怡宝 | 71.43% | 4.08% | 0% | 65.31% | 32.65% | View Details |
| 娃娃哈哈 | 67.35% | 2.04% | 5.56% | 63.27% | 22.45% | View Details |
| 百百岁山 | 53.06% | 0% | 0% | 48.98% | 24.49% | View Details |
| 康康师傅 | 53.06% | 0% | 0% | 48.98% | 12.24% | View Details |
| 依依云 | 44.9% | 2.04% | 5.56% | 40.82% | 14.29% | View Details |
| IIcelandic Glacial (Current Brand) | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 2.04% | View Details |
