As of 2026-04-02, 胶原棒（次抛精华）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 敏感修复精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 胶原棒（次抛精华）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
胶原棒（次抛精华）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
胶原棒（次抛精华）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
胶原棒（次抛精华）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
胶原棒（次抛精华）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
胶原棒（次抛精华）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 色色修精华 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 浓浓缩修护精华露 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 舒舒敏保湿修护精华液 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 绿绿宝瓶PRO精华 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 传传明酸精华液 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| CCicalfate+修护精华 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 胶胶原棒（次抛精华） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
