As of 2026-04-02, 金生幼儿园's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 学前教育 category shows: The overall mention rate is 2.70%, below the industry average by 3.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (2.70%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 金生幼儿园's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
金生幼儿园's Mention Rate is 2.70%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
金生幼儿园's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
金生幼儿园's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
金生幼儿园's Positive Rate is 2.70%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
金生幼儿园's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 金金宝贝 | 64.86% | 24.32% | 18.18% | 51.35% | 29.73% | View Details |
| 美美吉姆 | 43.24% | 5.41% | 0% | 29.73% | 24.32% | View Details |
| 新新东方满天星 | 37.84% | 5.41% | 0% | 37.84% | 2.7% | View Details |
| 红红黄蓝 | 24.32% | 8.11% | 18.18% | 16.22% | 8.11% | View Details |
| 悦悦宝园 | 16.22% | 0% | 0% | 5.41% | 16.22% | View Details |
| 新新爱婴 | 10.81% | 0% | 0% | 10.81% | 2.7% | View Details |
| 金金生幼儿园 (Current Brand) | 2.7% | 0% | 0% | 2.7% | 0% | View Details |
