As of 2026-03-30, 金属防盗刷卡包's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 卡包 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 14.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 金属防盗刷卡包's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
金属防盗刷卡包's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
金属防盗刷卡包's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
金属防盗刷卡包's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
金属防盗刷卡包's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
金属防盗刷卡包's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 七七匹狼 | 26.79% | 3.57% | 0% | 26.79% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 金金利来 | 23.21% | 7.14% | 0% | 23.21% | 1.79% | View Details |
| CCoach | 17.86% | 1.79% | 0% | 17.86% | 5.36% | View Details |
| CCharles&Keith | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 1.79% | View Details |
| BBally | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| CCHARLES&KEITH拉链卡包 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 金金属防盗刷卡包 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
