As of 2026-03-29, 《经典常谈》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 图书出版物 category shows: The overall mention rate is 3.57%, above the industry average by 3.0 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (3.57%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《经典常谈》's overall mention rate surpasses 5 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《经典常谈》's Mention Rate is 3.57%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《经典常谈》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《经典常谈》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《经典常谈》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《经典常谈》's Negative Rate is 3.57%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《西厢记》 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 《《经典常谈》 (Current Brand) | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 《《辞源》 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《世说新语（中学生版）》 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 《《骆驼祥子》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《红楼梦》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《明朝那些事儿》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
