As of 2026-03-31, 京东京造竹粹本色抽纸's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 卫生纸 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 27.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 5 competitors in the same category, 京东京造竹粹本色抽纸's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
京东京造竹粹本色抽纸's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
京东京造竹粹本色抽纸's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
京东京造竹粹本色抽纸's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
京东京造竹粹本色抽纸's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
京东京造竹粹本色抽纸's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 维维达 | 55.36% | 44.64% | 4.76% | 53.57% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 维维达有芯卷纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 清清风金装抽纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 清清风原木精装卷纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达抽纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 京京东京造竹粹本色抽纸 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
