As of 2026-03-29, 京东京造竹笋本色抽纸's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 抽纸 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 10.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 京东京造竹笋本色抽纸's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
京东京造竹笋本色抽纸's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
京东京造竹笋本色抽纸's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
京东京造竹笋本色抽纸's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
京东京造竹笋本色抽纸's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
京东京造竹笋本色抽纸's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 维维达 | 73.21% | 50% | 23.81% | 67.86% | 16.07% | View Details |
| 维维达超韧系列 | 10.71% | 0% | 9.52% | 10.71% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 超超韧系列 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 7.14% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达棉韧系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 鼻鼻贵族系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 洁洁柔黑Face系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 京京东京造竹笋本色抽纸 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
