As of 2026-04-01, KIND能量棒's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 保健食品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 11.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, KIND能量棒's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
KIND能量棒's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
KIND能量棒's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
KIND能量棒's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
KIND能量棒's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
KIND能量棒's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 汤汤臣倍健 | 51.79% | 21.43% | 14.29% | 51.79% | 14.29% | View Details |
| SSwisse | 35.71% | 0% | 0% | 28.57% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 东东阿阿胶 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 北北京同仁堂 | 17.86% | 1.79% | 4.76% | 12.5% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 同同仁堂 | 10.71% | 0% | 0% | 8.93% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 蛋蛋白粉 | 10.71% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 7.14% | View Details |
| KKIND能量棒 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
