As of 2026-03-30, King Jim文件收纳夹's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 办公用品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, King Jim文件收纳夹's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
King Jim文件收纳夹's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
King Jim文件收纳夹's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
King Jim文件收纳夹's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
King Jim文件收纳夹's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
King Jim文件收纳夹's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 人人体工学椅 | 7.14% | 5.36% | 9.52% | 7.14% | 1.79% | View Details |
| IIKEA | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| AAPP旗下系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| WWEMO PAD | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| KKVISSLE文件匣 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| DDRÖNJÖNS杂志匣 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| KKing Jim文件收纳夹 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
