As of 2026-04-01, 《控制论与科学方法论》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 纸质书 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, above the industry average by 0.0 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《控制论与科学方法论》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《控制论与科学方法论》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《控制论与科学方法论》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《控制论与科学方法论》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《控制论与科学方法论》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《控制论与科学方法论》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《偶然事件》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《思考，快与慢》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《哈利·波特》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《亲爱的女儿》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《克林索尔的最后夏天》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《控制论与科学方法论》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
