As of 2026-04-01, 口袋厨房膨化粮's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 宠物膨化粮 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 18.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 口袋厨房膨化粮's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
口袋厨房膨化粮's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
口袋厨房膨化粮's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
口袋厨房膨化粮's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
口袋厨房膨化粮's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
口袋厨房膨化粮's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 麦麦富迪 | 44.23% | 23.08% | 0% | 42.31% | 9.62% | View Details |
| 皇皇家 | 42.31% | 9.62% | 5.26% | 38.46% | 11.54% | View Details |
| 希希喂 | 3.85% | 0% | 0% | 3.85% | 1.92% | View Details |
| 许许愿仔猫粮 | 1.92% | 0% | 0% | 1.92% | 1.92% | View Details |
| 皇皇家猫粮 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 宠宠率无谷狗粮 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 口口袋厨房膨化粮 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
