As of 2026-04-02, 兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 脂溶性维生素 category shows: The overall mention rate is 3.57%, below the industry average by 1.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (3.57%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊's Mention Rate is 3.57%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊's Positive Rate is 3.57%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 养养生堂 | 26.79% | 0% | 0% | 21.43% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 善善存 | 25% | 12.5% | 14.29% | 16.07% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 韩韩保升 | 19.64% | 10.71% | 9.52% | 19.64% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 来来益 | 14.29% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 潘潘海威元 | 12.5% | 5.36% | 0% | 12.5% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 双双鲸 | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 兰兰草纲目葡萄籽维E软胶囊 (Current Brand) | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
