As of 2026-04-02, 蓝爵's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 宠物主粮 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 蓝爵's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
蓝爵's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
蓝爵's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
蓝爵's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
蓝爵's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
蓝爵's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 皇皇家 | 71.43% | 30.36% | 28.57% | 67.86% | 21.43% | View Details |
| 麦麦富迪 | 57.14% | 21.43% | 4.76% | 55.36% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 伯伯纳天纯 | 48.21% | 3.57% | 0% | 48.21% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 鲜鲜朗 | 48.21% | 1.79% | 0% | 48.21% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 爱爱肯拿 | 46.43% | 0% | 0% | 33.93% | 17.86% | View Details |
| 网网易严选 | 33.93% | 0% | 0% | 30.36% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 蓝蓝爵 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
