As of 2026-04-02, 狼人杀卡牌's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 狼人杀卡牌's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
狼人杀卡牌's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
狼人杀卡牌's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
狼人杀卡牌's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
狼人杀卡牌's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
狼人杀卡牌's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《万智牌》 | 15.09% | 0% | 0% | 11.32% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 七七大奇迹 | 9.43% | 0% | 0% | 5.66% | 0% | View Details |
| 璀璀璨宝石 | 7.55% | 1.89% | 0% | 5.66% | 0% | View Details |
| 瘟瘟疫危机 | 3.77% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 强强手棋 | 1.89% | 0% | 0% | 1.89% | 0% | View Details |
| 扑扑克牌 | 1.89% | 0% | 0% | 1.89% | 0% | View Details |
| 狼狼人杀卡牌 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
