As of 2026-04-02, 劳力士日志型36's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 手表 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 劳力士日志型36's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
劳力士日志型36's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
劳力士日志型36's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
劳力士日志型36's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
劳力士日志型36's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
劳力士日志型36's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 积积家 | 16.07% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 0% | View Details |
| 宝宝珀 | 8.93% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| 欧欧米茄海马300 | 5.36% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 苹苹果Apple Watch | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 百百达翡丽鹦鹉螺 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 西西铁城光动能 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 劳劳力士日志型36 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
