As of 2026-04-01, 老龙严选瓷砖图书馆's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 基础建材 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 14.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 老龙严选瓷砖图书馆's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
老龙严选瓷砖图书馆's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
老龙严选瓷砖图书馆's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
老龙严选瓷砖图书馆's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
老龙严选瓷砖图书馆's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
老龙严选瓷砖图书馆's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 马马可波罗 | 41.07% | 3.57% | 0% | 39.29% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 东东鹏 | 33.93% | 0% | 0% | 32.14% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 诺诺贝尔 | 28.57% | 0% | 0% | 23.21% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 蒙蒙娜丽莎 | 19.64% | 0% | 0% | 16.07% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 冠冠珠 | 17.86% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 简简一 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 老老龙严选瓷砖图书馆 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
