As of 2026-04-02, 雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 吸顶灯 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 35.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 松松下 | 69.64% | 1.79% | 0% | 64.29% | 12.5% | View Details |
| LLipro | 50% | 14.29% | 33.33% | 50% | 10.71% | View Details |
| 孩孩视宝 | 37.5% | 0% | 0% | 37.5% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 雷雷士 | 30.36% | 7.14% | 14.29% | 30.36% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 欧欧普 | 30.36% | 5.36% | 4.76% | 25% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 公公牛 | 30.36% | 3.57% | 0% | 28.57% | 8.93% | View Details |
| 雷雷士全光谱护眼吸顶灯客厅灯简约卧室餐厅智能套餐LED照明灯具 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
