As of 2026-03-30, 雷士智能吸顶灯's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 灯光设备 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 9.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 雷士智能吸顶灯's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
雷士智能吸顶灯's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
雷士智能吸顶灯's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
雷士智能吸顶灯's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
雷士智能吸顶灯's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
雷士智能吸顶灯's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 飞飞利浦 | 21.43% | 3.57% | 0% | 16.07% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 三三雄极光 | 21.43% | 0% | 0% | 16.07% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 佛佛山照明 | 17.86% | 0% | 0% | 10.71% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 松松下 | 16.07% | 0% | 0% | 10.71% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 公公牛 | 10.71% | 0% | 0% | 7.14% | 0% | View Details |
| LLipro | 8.93% | 0% | 0% | 8.93% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 雷雷士智能吸顶灯 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
