As of 2026-04-02, LEL's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 润滑剂 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 8.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, LEL's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
LEL's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
LEL's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
LEL's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
LEL's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
LEL's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 壳壳牌 | 53.57% | 37.5% | 0% | 48.21% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 嘉嘉实多 | 48.21% | 0% | 0% | 44.64% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 美美孚 | 42.86% | 10.71% | 0% | 37.5% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 长长城润滑油 | 41.07% | 0% | 0% | 39.29% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 杜杜蕾斯 | 23.21% | 8.93% | 14.29% | 19.64% | 0% | View Details |
| 冈冈本 | 16.07% | 0% | 0% | 14.29% | 0% | View Details |
| LLEL (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
