As of 2026-03-31, 龙牌's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 装修材料 category shows: The overall mention rate is 14.29%, above the industry average by 9.7 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 4.76%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Positive mention rate (14.29%) is slightly higher than negative (0.00%), continue monitoring public sentiment. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 龙牌's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
龙牌's Mention Rate is 14.29%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
龙牌's First Mention is 4.76%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
龙牌's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
龙牌's Positive Rate is 14.29%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
龙牌's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 千千年舟 | 47.62% | 7.14% | 0% | 42.86% | 0% | View Details |
| 兔兔宝宝 | 45.24% | 9.52% | 0% | 40.48% | 4.76% | View Details |
| 圣圣象 | 45.24% | 9.52% | 0% | 40.48% | 0% | View Details |
| 莫莫干山 | 45.24% | 0% | 0% | 35.71% | 2.38% | View Details |
| 立立邦 | 42.86% | 11.9% | 41.67% | 35.71% | 23.81% | View Details |
| 新新港集团 | 33.33% | 11.9% | 0% | 33.33% | 2.38% | View Details |
| 龙龙牌 (Current Brand) | 14.29% | 4.76% | 0% | 14.29% | 0% | View Details |
