As of 2026-04-01, 《龙翼编年史》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 2.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《龙翼编年史》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《龙翼编年史》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《龙翼编年史》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《龙翼编年史》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《龙翼编年史》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《龙翼编年史》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卡卡卡颂 | 11.32% | 0% | 0% | 9.43% | 0% | View Details |
| 波波多黎各 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| AAuf Heller und Pfennig | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《自然和弦》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 花花砖物语 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《大杀四方》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《龙翼编年史》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
