As of 2026-04-02, Lululemon Throwback Still Pant's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 阔腿裤 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 3.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Lululemon Throwback Still Pant's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Lululemon Throwback Still Pant's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Lululemon Throwback Still Pant's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Lululemon Throwback Still Pant's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Lululemon Throwback Still Pant's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Lululemon Throwback Still Pant's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCOS | 64.29% | 30.36% | 52.38% | 64.29% | 26.79% | View Details |
| ZZARA | 19.64% | 0% | 0% | 16.07% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 哥哥弟 | 14.29% | 7.14% | 0% | 14.29% | 0% | View Details |
| CCOSA cOSB | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 7.14% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 安安踏 | 3.57% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 回回力 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| LLululemon Throwback Still Pant (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
