As of 2026-04-01, 《罗生门》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 纸质书 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《罗生门》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《罗生门》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《罗生门》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《罗生门》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《罗生门》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《罗生门》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《真事隐：康熙废储与正史虚构》 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《局外人》 | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《苏东坡传》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《庆余年》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《流浪地球》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《原则》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《罗生门》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
