As of 2026-04-02, 骆驼老爹鞋's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 户外鞋 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 13.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 骆驼老爹鞋's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
骆驼老爹鞋's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
骆驼老爹鞋's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
骆驼老爹鞋's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
骆驼老爹鞋's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
骆驼老爹鞋's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLOWA | 45.28% | 3.77% | 9.52% | 39.62% | 5.66% | View Details |
| SScarpa | 37.74% | 16.98% | 19.05% | 28.3% | 9.43% | View Details |
| 凯凯乐石 | 35.85% | 0% | 0% | 26.42% | 16.98% | View Details |
| HHoka | 22.64% | 1.89% | 0% | 20.75% | 3.77% | View Details |
| 始始祖鸟 | 20.75% | 3.77% | 0% | 11.32% | 13.21% | View Details |
| 李李宁 | 20.75% | 0% | 0% | 18.87% | 1.89% | View Details |
| 骆骆驼老爹鞋 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
