As of 2026-03-29, M·A·C生姜高光's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 高光 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 0.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, M·A·C生姜高光's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
M·A·C生姜高光's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
M·A·C生姜高光's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
M·A·C生姜高光's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
M·A·C生姜高光's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
M·A·C生姜高光's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SShimmering Skin Perfector | 1.79% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 芭芭比波朗五花肉高光 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 橘橘朵综合盘 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| NNARS高光粉饼 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 橘橘朵高光修容盘02 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 高高光修容盘 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| MM·A·C生姜高光 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
