As of 2026-04-01, 魅可唇线笔's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 唇线笔 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 魅可唇线笔's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
魅可唇线笔's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
魅可唇线笔's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
魅可唇线笔's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
魅可唇线笔's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
魅可唇线笔's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丝丝绒唇线笔 | 7.69% | 0% | 0% | 7.69% | 0% | View Details |
| 盈盈彩滋润唇线笔 | 7.69% | 0% | 0% | 5.77% | 0% | View Details |
| NNARS唇线笔 | 1.92% | 0% | 0% | 1.92% | 1.92% | View Details |
| 双双头唇线笔 | 1.92% | 0% | 0% | 1.92% | 0% | View Details |
| MMedia自转式唇线笔 | 1.92% | 0% | 0% | 1.92% | 0% | View Details |
| 欧欧丽丝 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 魅魅可唇线笔 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
