As of 2026-03-31, Method's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 养护用品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Method's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Method's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Method's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Method's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Method's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Method's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33M | 58.93% | 50% | 33.33% | 53.57% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 蔬蔬果园 | 8.93% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| 老老管家 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| 沫沫檬 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 索索邦 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 3.57% | 0% | View Details |
| 滴滴露 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 1.79% | 0% | View Details |
| MMethod (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
