As of 2026-03-29, 穆松桥（PAM）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 建筑材料 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 13.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 穆松桥（PAM）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
穆松桥（PAM）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
穆松桥（PAM）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
穆松桥（PAM）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
穆松桥（PAM）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
穆松桥（PAM）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 东东方雨虹 | 36.36% | 0% | 0% | 36.36% | 5.45% | View Details |
| 北北新建材 | 16.36% | 5.45% | 9.52% | 16.36% | 1.82% | View Details |
| 高高仪（Grohe） | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| SSherwin-Williams（宣伟） | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 汉汉斯格雅（Hansgrohe） | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 芬芬琳漆（Tikkurila） | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 穆穆松桥（PAM） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
