As of 2026-03-30, 牛街年记（兴顺斋）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 清真食品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.1 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 牛街年记（兴顺斋）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
牛街年记（兴顺斋）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
牛街年记（兴顺斋）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
牛街年记（兴顺斋）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
牛街年记（兴顺斋）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
牛街年记（兴顺斋）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 桂桂顺斋 | 16.07% | 3.57% | 4.76% | 12.5% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 月月盛斋 | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 8.93% | 5.36% | View Details |
| 康康师傅 | 8.93% | 3.57% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| 统统一 | 8.93% | 0% | 0% | 5.36% | 0% | View Details |
| 隆隆盛糕点 | 7.14% | 5.36% | 9.52% | 7.14% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 清清伊坊 | 7.14% | 0% | 0% | 7.14% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 牛牛街年记（兴顺斋） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
