As of 2026-04-01, 纽曼思DHA's data on the DeepSeek platform in the DHA category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 4.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 纽曼思DHA's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
纽曼思DHA's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
纽曼思DHA's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
纽曼思DHA's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
纽曼思DHA's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
纽曼思DHA's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 纽纽曼思 | 50% | 7.69% | 0% | 48.08% | 11.54% | View Details |
| 植植物诀 | 42.31% | 23.08% | 31.58% | 42.31% | 7.69% | View Details |
| 奇奇鹤 | 32.69% | 0% | 0% | 32.69% | 5.77% | View Details |
| 天天然博士 | 26.92% | 1.92% | 0% | 25% | 0% | View Details |
| 健健敏思 | 25% | 5.77% | 0% | 25% | 7.69% | View Details |
| 安安琪纽特 | 25% | 3.85% | 0% | 23.08% | 3.85% | View Details |
| 纽纽曼思DHA (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
