As of 2026-03-31, 抛光砖's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 建筑陶瓷 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 20.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 抛光砖's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
抛光砖's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
抛光砖's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
抛光砖's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
抛光砖's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
抛光砖's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 马马可波罗 | 69.64% | 62.5% | 38.1% | 69.64% | 12.5% | View Details |
| 诺诺贝尔 | 55.36% | 5.36% | 9.52% | 51.79% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 东东鹏 | 44.64% | 0% | 0% | 42.86% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 冠冠珠 | 35.71% | 0% | 0% | 35.71% | 3.57% | View Details |
| 岩岩板 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 中中板 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 抛抛光砖 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
