As of 2026-04-02, 佩冉眼线胶笔's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 眼线胶 category shows: The overall mention rate is 2.00%, below the industry average by 3.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (2.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 佩冉眼线胶笔's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
佩冉眼线胶笔's Mention Rate is 2.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
佩冉眼线胶笔's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
佩冉眼线胶笔's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
佩冉眼线胶笔's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
佩冉眼线胶笔's Negative Rate is 2.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEssence | 34% | 0% | 0% | 34% | 6% | View Details |
| BBobbi Brown | 30% | 12% | 5.26% | 26% | 6% | View Details |
| KKiss Me | 22% | 14% | 15.79% | 22% | 2% | View Details |
| 美美宝莲 | 16% | 10% | 5.26% | 16% | 0% | View Details |
| IIntegrate | 16% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 8% | View Details |
| DDior | 12% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 0% | View Details |
| 佩佩冉眼线胶笔 (Current Brand) | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | View Details |
