As of 2026-04-02, 皮尔卡丹's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 户外休闲 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 6.5 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 皮尔卡丹's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
皮尔卡丹's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
皮尔卡丹's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
皮尔卡丹's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
皮尔卡丹's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
皮尔卡丹's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 始始祖鸟 | 59.09% | 36.36% | 0% | 52.27% | 25% | View Details |
| 骆骆驼 | 54.55% | 9.09% | 15.38% | 50% | 6.82% | View Details |
| 凯凯乐石 | 52.27% | 0% | 0% | 47.73% | 2.27% | View Details |
| 伯伯希和 | 40.91% | 4.55% | 15.38% | 38.64% | 4.55% | View Details |
| PPatagonia | 34.09% | 20.45% | 69.23% | 34.09% | 9.09% | View Details |
| 思思凯乐 | 31.82% | 9.09% | 0% | 29.55% | 2.27% | View Details |
| 皮皮尔卡丹 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
