As of 2026-04-01, Purid沁透光感精华's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 5.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, Purid沁透光感精华's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
Purid沁透光感精华's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
Purid沁透光感精华's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
Purid沁透光感精华's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
Purid沁透光感精华's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
Purid沁透光感精华's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSK-II | 153.15% | 25.98% | 1.04% | 135.04% | 23.23% | View Details |
| 倩倩碧镭射瓶 | 50.39% | 1.18% | 0% | 42.52% | 23.62% | View Details |
| OOLAY淡斑小白瓶 | 29.92% | 0% | 0% | 27.17% | 11.42% | View Details |
| OOLAY水光小白瓶 | 29.13% | 1.97% | 3.13% | 26.77% | 1.57% | View Details |
| 城城野医生377精华 | 24.41% | 0% | 0% | 20.08% | 6.69% | View Details |
| 娇娇韵诗光芒小瓷瓶 | 24.02% | 0% | 0% | 18.5% | 4.33% | View Details |
| PPurid沁透光感精华 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
