As of 2026-03-30, 奇士美眼线液笔's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 眼线液 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.9 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 奇士美眼线液笔's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
奇士美眼线液笔's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
奇士美眼线液笔's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
奇士美眼线液笔's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
奇士美眼线液笔's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
奇士美眼线液笔's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 橘橘朵 | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 12.5% | 7.14% | View Details |
| 美美宝莲 | 8.93% | 1.79% | 0% | 8.93% | 1.79% | View Details |
| 小小奥汀 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 玛玛丽黛佳眼线液 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 香香奈儿眼线液 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 橘橘朵极细眼线液笔 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 奇奇士美眼线液笔 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
