As of 2026-03-31, 倩碧 302光子镭射瓶's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 倩碧 302光子镭射瓶's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
倩碧 302光子镭射瓶's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
倩碧 302光子镭射瓶's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
倩碧 302光子镭射瓶's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
倩碧 302光子镭射瓶's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
倩碧 302光子镭射瓶's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSK-II 小灯泡 | 3.7% | 3.7% | 9.52% | 3.7% | 3.7% | View Details |
| SSK-II 肌因光蕴美白精华 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 兰兰蔻 极光精华 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 资资生堂 红腰子 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 优优理氏 美白次抛精华 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 欧欧莱雅 双抗精华（第三代） | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 倩倩碧 302光子镭射瓶 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
