As of 2026-04-02, 倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 8.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSK-II | 44.44% | 3.7% | 4.76% | 40.74% | 9.26% | View Details |
| 韩韩束 | 31.48% | 22.22% | 0% | 31.48% | 0% | View Details |
| 资资生堂 | 22.22% | 1.85% | 0% | 22.22% | 1.85% | View Details |
| 欧欧莱雅 | 12.96% | 1.85% | 0% | 9.26% | 1.85% | View Details |
| 兰兰蔻 | 9.26% | 0% | 0% | 9.26% | 0% | View Details |
| 雅雅诗兰黛 | 7.41% | 0% | 0% | 7.41% | 0% | View Details |
| 倩倩碧「302光子镭射瓶」 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
