As of 2026-03-31, 倩碧 302镭射瓶's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 10.6 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 倩碧 302镭射瓶's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
倩碧 302镭射瓶's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
倩碧 302镭射瓶's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
倩碧 302镭射瓶's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
倩碧 302镭射瓶's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
倩碧 302镭射瓶's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSK-II | 48.15% | 3.7% | 4.76% | 44.44% | 9.26% | View Details |
| 谷谷雨 | 40.74% | 5.56% | 0% | 40.74% | 3.7% | View Details |
| OOlay | 40.74% | 1.85% | 4.76% | 37.04% | 14.81% | View Details |
| 珀珀莱雅 | 35.19% | 0% | 0% | 33.33% | 3.7% | View Details |
| 城城野医生 | 35.19% | 0% | 0% | 31.48% | 9.26% | View Details |
| 谷谷雨净白瓶 | 31.48% | 16.67% | 23.81% | 29.63% | 11.11% | View Details |
| 倩倩碧 302镭射瓶 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
