As of 2026-03-31, 倩碧 302 镭射瓶's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 美白精华 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 6.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 倩碧 302 镭射瓶's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
倩碧 302 镭射瓶's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
倩碧 302 镭射瓶's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
倩碧 302 镭射瓶's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
倩碧 302 镭射瓶's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
倩碧 302 镭射瓶's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSK-II | 48.15% | 3.7% | 4.76% | 44.44% | 9.26% | View Details |
| OOlay | 40.74% | 1.85% | 4.76% | 37.04% | 14.81% | View Details |
| 资资生堂 | 20.37% | 1.85% | 0% | 20.37% | 1.85% | View Details |
| 悦悦罗兰 | 12.96% | 1.85% | 0% | 12.96% | 1.85% | View Details |
| 兰兰蔻 | 11.11% | 0% | 0% | 11.11% | 0% | View Details |
| 科科颜氏 | 9.26% | 0% | 0% | 9.26% | 0% | View Details |
| 倩倩碧 302 镭射瓶 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
