As of 2026-04-01, 清风原木's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 抽纸 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 9.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 清风原木's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
清风原木's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
清风原木's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
清风原木's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
清风原木's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
清风原木's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 维维达 | 73.08% | 50% | 26.32% | 67.31% | 19.23% | View Details |
| 维维达超韧系列 | 13.46% | 0% | 5.26% | 13.46% | 5.77% | View Details |
| FFace系列 | 3.85% | 0% | 0% | 3.85% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达超韧 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 斑斑布竹浆纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 维维达手帕纸 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 清清风原木 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
