As of 2026-03-31, 雀牧驼奶钙片's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 保健食品 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 9.2 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 雀牧驼奶钙片's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
雀牧驼奶钙片's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
雀牧驼奶钙片's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
雀牧驼奶钙片's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
雀牧驼奶钙片's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
雀牧驼奶钙片's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 汤汤臣倍健 | 50.94% | 22.64% | 14.29% | 50.94% | 13.21% | View Details |
| SSwisse | 35.85% | 0% | 0% | 30.19% | 13.21% | View Details |
| 东东阿阿胶 | 20.75% | 0% | 0% | 20.75% | 7.55% | View Details |
| 同同仁堂 | 16.98% | 0% | 0% | 15.09% | 7.55% | View Details |
| 诺诺特兰德 | 15.09% | 0% | 0% | 13.21% | 15.09% | View Details |
| WWonderLab | 15.09% | 0% | 0% | 13.21% | 0% | View Details |
| 雀雀牧驼奶钙片 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
