As of 2026-03-29, 鹊石智慧的Banma's data on the DeepSeek platform in the AI辅助编码 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 20.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 鹊石智慧的Banma's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
鹊石智慧的Banma's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
鹊石智慧的Banma's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
鹊石智慧的Banma's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
鹊石智慧的Banma's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
鹊石智慧的Banma's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCursor | 91.84% | 26.53% | 35.71% | 87.76% | 40.82% | View Details |
| 通通义灵码 | 38.78% | 2.04% | 0% | 36.73% | 12.24% | View Details |
| 腾腾讯CodeBuddy | 18.37% | 0% | 0% | 18.37% | 12.24% | View Details |
| 百百度文心快码 | 8.16% | 0% | 0% | 8.16% | 0% | View Details |
| 阿阿里通义灵码 | 4.08% | 0% | 0% | 4.08% | 0% | View Details |
| DDeepSeek R1 | 2.04% | 0% | 0% | 2.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 鹊鹊石智慧的Banma (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
