As of 2026-03-31, 日志型36's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 手表 category shows: The overall mention rate is 1.82%, below the industry average by 4.0 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (1.82%) has exceeded positive (1.82%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 5 competitors in the same category, 日志型36's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
日志型36's Mention Rate is 1.82%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
日志型36's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
日志型36's Preferred Rate is 4.76%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
日志型36's Positive Rate is 1.82%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
日志型36's Negative Rate is 1.82%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 迪迪通拿 | 14.55% | 0% | 0% | 7.27% | 0% | View Details |
| 潜潜航者 | 5.45% | 0% | 0% | 1.82% | 0% | View Details |
| 卡卡西欧G-Shock | 3.64% | 0% | 0% | 3.64% | 3.64% | View Details |
| 爱爱彼皇家橡树 | 3.64% | 0% | 0% | 1.82% | 1.82% | View Details |
| 鹦鹦鹉螺 | 1.82% | 0% | 0% | 1.82% | 0% | View Details |
| 日日志型36 (Current Brand) | 1.82% | 0% | 4.76% | 1.82% | 1.82% | View Details |
