As of 2026-04-01, RMS Beauty高光膏's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 腮红 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 1.3 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, RMS Beauty高光膏's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
RMS Beauty高光膏's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
RMS Beauty高光膏's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
RMS Beauty高光膏's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
RMS Beauty高光膏's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
RMS Beauty高光膏's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRARE BEAUTY | 6.38% | 0% | 0% | 6.38% | 0% | View Details |
| MMAC | 6.38% | 0% | 0% | 4.26% | 2.13% | View Details |
| FFenty Beauty | 4.26% | 0% | 0% | 4.26% | 0% | View Details |
| HHourglass | 4.26% | 0% | 0% | 4.26% | 0% | View Details |
| TTom Ford | 2.13% | 0% | 0% | 2.13% | 0% | View Details |
| MMake Up For Ever | 2.13% | 0% | 0% | 2.13% | 0% | View Details |
| RRMS Beauty高光膏 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
