As of 2026-04-01, 瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone）'s data on the DeepSeek platform in the 巧克力 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 9.8 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 3 competitors in the same category, 瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone）'s overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone）'s Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone）'s First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone）'s Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone）'s Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone）'s Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 明明治 | 19.64% | 0% | 0% | 19.64% | 1.79% | View Details |
| LLindt Excellence | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 瑞瑞士莲（Lindt）Excellence系列70%黑巧克力 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 瑞瑞士三角巧克力（Toblerone） (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
