As of 2026-04-02, 《三国杀标准版》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 6.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《三国杀标准版》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《三国杀标准版》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《三国杀标准版》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《三国杀标准版》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《三国杀标准版》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《三国杀标准版》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《卡坦岛》 | 36.17% | 12.77% | 35.29% | 34.04% | 0% | View Details |
| 大大富翁 | 10.64% | 2.13% | 5.88% | 6.38% | 2.13% | View Details |
| 《《大富翁》 | 10.64% | 0% | 0% | 8.51% | 0% | View Details |
| 卡卡坦岛 | 10.64% | 0% | 0% | 6.38% | 0% | View Details |
| 狼狼人杀 | 4.26% | 0% | 0% | 4.26% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《UNO》 | 4.26% | 0% | 0% | 4.26% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《三国杀标准版》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
