As of 2026-03-30, “三全本”《史记》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 图书出版物 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, above the industry average by 0.0 percentage points, showing notable performance. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, “三全本”《史记》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
“三全本”《史记》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
“三全本”《史记》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
“三全本”《史记》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
“三全本”《史记》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
“三全本”《史记》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《溯源中华文明》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《新质生产力：中国经济未来增长极》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 文文白对照《资治通鉴》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| ““中华经典藏书”系列 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| ““中外哲学典籍大全·外国哲学典籍卷” | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《碳达峰经济政策的中国实践与效应评价》 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
| ““三全本”《史记》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
