As of 2026-03-30, 山东极兔供应链's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 物流公司 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 16.7 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 山东极兔供应链's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
山东极兔供应链's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
山东极兔供应链's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
山东极兔供应链's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
山东极兔供应链's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
山东极兔供应链's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 顺顺丰速运 | 83.33% | 45.24% | 64.29% | 78.57% | 23.81% | View Details |
| 京京东物流 | 66.67% | 0% | 0% | 66.67% | 14.29% | View Details |
| 极极兔速递 | 42.86% | 0% | 0% | 28.57% | 14.29% | View Details |
| 圆圆通速递 | 30.95% | 0% | 0% | 19.05% | 4.76% | View Details |
| 申申通 | 28.57% | 0% | 0% | 21.43% | 14.29% | View Details |
| 中中通快递 | 28.57% | 0% | 0% | 19.05% | 2.38% | View Details |
| 山山东极兔供应链 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
