As of 2026-03-31, 《蛇梯棋》's data on the DeepSeek platform in the 怀旧桌游 category shows: The overall mention rate is 0.00%, below the industry average by 4.4 percentage points, with significant room for improvement. The first mention rate is only 0.00%, it is recommended to enhance first-position exposure in AI model responses. Negative mention rate (0.00%) has exceeded positive (0.00%), it is recommended to immediately initiate reputation repair. Among 6 competitors in the same category, 《蛇梯棋》's overall mention rate surpasses 0 brands. AIGeo recommends combining the above data to formulate targeted brand monitoring strategies to further enhance brand visibility and reputation in the AI search ecosystem.
《蛇梯棋》's Mention Rate is 0.00%, lower than 0.6% of competitors
《蛇梯棋》's First Mention is 0.00%, lower than 0.9% of competitors
《蛇梯棋》's Preferred Rate is 0.00%, lower than 100.0% of competitors
《蛇梯棋》's Positive Rate is 0.00%, lower than 8.9% of competitors
《蛇梯棋》's Negative Rate is 0.00%, higher than 96.3% of competitors
| Competitor | Mention Rate | First Mention | Preferred Rate | Positive Rate | Negative Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 《《卡坦岛》 | 31.91% | 10.64% | 29.41% | 29.79% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《卡卡颂》 | 29.79% | 0% | 0% | 21.28% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《三国杀》 | 23.4% | 0% | 0% | 21.28% | 4.26% | View Details |
| 《《米勒山谷狼人》 | 12.77% | 0% | 0% | 8.51% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《大富翁》 | 10.64% | 0% | 0% | 10.64% | 0% | View Details |
| 《《狼人杀》 | 10.64% | 0% | 0% | 8.51% | 2.13% | View Details |
| 《《蛇梯棋》 (Current Brand) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | View Details |
